Charles Forceville (2002). “The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors.”

“The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1-14.

Abstract: Lakoff and Johnson’s dictum that “metaphor is primarily a matter of thought and action and only derivatively a matter of language (1980: 153) has given rise to numerous studies investigating how metaphors’ verbal manifestations relate to their cognitive origins. Curious­ly, little attention has hitherto been paid to a logical extension of this adage, namely the examination of non-verbal metaphor, for instance pictorial metaphor. In this article, Noel Carroll’s (1994, 1996) proposals concerning the nature and identifiability of pictorial metaphors are discussed in terms of the model developed by Forceville (1996). Two theses inherent in Carroll’s approach are investigated and rejected: (1) that most prototypical pictorial metaphors, unlike verbal ones, allow a reversibility of their respective targets and sources; and (2) that prototypical pictorial metaphors are `homospatially noncompossible’, that is, that they are visual hybrids. The article ends by making suggestions concerning the inves­ti­gation of cinematic metaphors in line with Forceville (1996). Keywords: Pictorial/visual metaphor; Picture analysis; Images & Cognition; Metaphorical (ir)reversibility.

Download article: http://dare.uva.nl/en/record/309881

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Abstracts & Papers., Metaphor and other tropes (Abstracts). Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s